Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Villa Hotel

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 April 15.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:33, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Villa Hotel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable hotel. DimaG (talk) 23:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems like a place that has a lot of notable history. There is no need to worry about advertising, since it does not exist anymore. Dew Kane (talk) 04:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Has 34 Google hits. No sources in article. Article makes a lot of claims, but the interesting ones only peripherally mention the hotel. Abductive (reasoning) 02:43, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Abductive makes a good point. Cynof Gavuf 10:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.